| Have you ever had a student write to tell you | | | | quickly zip back in time. |
| they've achieved Grade A's at exams? I have, and | | | | English is a Germanic language and written English |
| one of them was a grade A in English! | | | | originally shared possessive forms with German. If we |
| The apostrophe seems to be the most | | | | go back to the 14th century, when Chaucer wrote |
| misunderstood punctuation mark in the English | | | | "Canterbury Tales", we find that possessives didn't |
| language, and yet its use is really very simple. | | | | include apostrophes, but had an extra "e" added. |
| There's really only one rule: an apostrophe is used to | | | | For example: |
| replace one or more missing letters. | | | | My daughteres toys / The manageres shop |
| Nothing more - nothing less. | | | | Although that looks very clumsy to us, that was the |
| Contractions | | | | accepted form of writing possessives in Chaucer's |
| A contraction is a word that is a shortened form of | | | | day. As the language has evolved, we've simply |
| one or several words through the removal of one or | | | | removed the extra 'e' and replaced it with an |
| more letters. | | | | apostrophe. The same applies where a person's name |
| The following are examples of commonly used | | | | is the possessive: |
| contractions. | | | | Lisaes toys / Jameses shopbecomes |
| Do not -> Don't | | | | Lisa's toys / James's shop |
| Did not -> Didn't | | | | Although in the case of words or names that end |
| Can not -> Can't | | | | with an 's', it's also acceptable to write |
| Was not -> Wasn't | | | | James' shop |
| We have -> We've | | | | So you see, even when using possessives, the |
| They are -> They're | | | | apostrophe is replacing a missing letter. |
| It is -> It's | | | | The Exception To The Rule |
| It has -> It's | | | | The possessive form of 'it' should never include an |
| The following are examples of contractions used | | | | apostrophe. "It's" is a contraction of "It is" while "its" |
| within a sentence: | | | | is the possessive form of "it" which is a pronoun and |
| The boy is walking the dog -> The boy's walking | | | | belong alongside other pronouns such as "his", "hers", |
| the dog | | | | "ours", "yours" and "theirs", none of which have |
| I did not steal the buns -> I didn't steal the buns | | | | apostrophes. |
| They were not walking to town -> They weren't | | | | Plural Possessives |
| walking to town | | | | The same rule as above applies but the apostrophe |
| There are times when we need to write as we | | | | is moved. |
| would speak. This is especially so when writing | | | | My sisters' clothes / The dogs' bones |
| dialogue in fiction. | | | | In these instances, the clothes belong to more than |
| The title of this article "That Cute Li'l Ol' Apostrophe" | | | | one sister and the bones belong to several dogs. |
| is an example. Here I've used apostrophes to show | | | | Chaucer would have written: |
| the contractions that are made in colloquial speech, | | | | My sisterses clothes / The dogses bones |
| as in the case of | | | | The last two letters have been removed and |
| Little -> Li'l | | | | replaced by an apostrophe. |
| Old -> Ol' | | | | If, however, the possessive is a word that already |
| You may well believe that the first example is wrong; | | | | donates the plural form of another word, as in the |
| that there should be an extra apostrophe to denote | | | | case of 'child/children', writing "the childrens' shoes" |
| the missing 'e' at the end of 'little'. That would be | | | | would be wrong. We already know from the word |
| wrong. | | | | itself that it means more than one child, making "The |
| We never use more than one apostrophe to a word. | | | | children's shoes" the correct way of writing it. |
| While the general rule is to use the apostrophe in | | | | Regular Plurals |
| place of the last missing letter, such as in "shall not | | | | Apostrophes are used ONLY in contractions and |
| -> shan't", if we need to choose between missing | | | | possessives. |
| letters that we'd normally pronounce and those that | | | | Carrot's for sale - Many duck's on a pond - I bought |
| are silent, use the apostrophe to denote the missing | | | | two CD's - Iwashed his sock's |
| sounds. | | | | The above are all examples of an apostrophe being |
| The use of apostrophes in contractions should be | | | | used to show that a word is plural. DON'T DO IT! |
| easy to remember. Just think of what the word | | | | It's wrong. |
| you're using really represents. If it's two words that | | | | Some otherwise excellent writers trip up on this point |
| have been joined to make one, an apostrophe should | | | | and by using an apostrophe where it isn't called for, |
| be in there somewhere. Likewise if it's a truncated | | | | the meaning of a sentence can change dramatically. |
| word. | | | | "Beware: Truck's turning!" |
| Possessives | | | | What does this mean? Does the turning belong to |
| First of all, a possessive is a word that owns the | | | | the truck? If so, why are we being warned of it? |
| word that follows it. Confused? Let me show you. | | | | Not that I've ever known a truck to own a turning |
| My daughter's toys | | | | so I can only assume that the apostrophe has been |
| The toys belong to my daughter, therefore daughter | | | | misused. |
| is the possessive word. | | | | "Beware: Trucks turning!" |
| The shop's manager | | | | That's better. Now we're being warned that trucks |
| While the shop doesn't actually own the manager, | | | | are likely to turn. |
| without the shop there would be no manager so | | | | Conclusion |
| shop becomes the possessive. However, | | | | The correct use of apostrophes shouldn't be difficult |
| The manager's shopwould also be correct as the | | | | to understand. It really is a case of "no missing letter |
| manager runs the shop. | | | | - no apostrophe needed". If you remember that |
| Possessives are always nouns. | | | | possessives also have missing letters and that 'its' is |
| But hold on.... where are the missing letters? | | | | an exception, you'll never need make an apostrophe |
| Good question. To understand the answer, let's | | | | blunder again. |